Pest management your auditor can sign off
Scheduled programmes for food processing, pharma, hospitality, warehousing and healthcare — with the trend charts, applicator licences and material safety sheets your audit actually asks for.
Built around the audit, not around the spray
What a managed programme gives you that a per-visit vendor cannot.
Trend reporting
Every device logged, every catch counted, plotted month on month. You walk into the audit with the graph already drawn.
Documentation pack
Applicator licences, material safety data sheets, approval certificates and the site plan — kept current and reissued on request.
Mapped device layout
Numbered bait stations and monitors on a drawn site plan, so an auditor can walk the floor and find every one of them.
Threshold escalation
Agreed action levels per zone. Cross one and a corrective visit is triggered automatically — you do not have to notice it first.
Programmes by requirement
In-house housekeeping vs a managed programme
Both cost money. Only one of them holds up on audit day.
| Suraksha programme | In-house / per-visit vendor | |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed applicator on site | Every visit, licence on file | Usually untrained staff |
| Device map with numbered stations | Drawn and maintained | None |
| Catch data trended over time | Monthly charts | Not recorded |
| Material safety data sheets | Current set, on file | Chased at audit time |
| Corrective action log | Raised, tracked, closed | Verbal |
| Threshold-triggered visits | Automatic | Only when someone complains |
| Auditor walkthrough support | We attend | You explain it alone |
| Single format across all sites | Yes, one contract | Different vendor per city |
What a managed programme covers
The standing scope. Site-specific additions are agreed after the survey.
- Survey
- Full site walk, risk mapping and zone classification before contract
- Device layout
- Numbered stations and monitors plotted on a drawn site plan
- Visit frequency
- Weekly, fortnightly or monthly per zone risk
- Applicators
- Licensed and trained; licence copies held in your file
- Materials
- Approved formulations with current safety data sheets
- Recording
- Per-device catch counts logged at every visit
- Reporting
- Monthly trend report plus a visit report each time
- Escalation
- Agreed thresholds per zone with automatic corrective visits
- Corrective actions
- Raised, owner assigned, tracked to closure
- Audit support
- Our supervisor attends third-party and customer audits
- Review
- Quarterly programme review with your QA team
- Billing
- Monthly GST invoice against a single contract
From enquiry to first report
Four steps. Most sites are running inside three weeks.
Site survey
You tell us the site type, area and the standard you are audited against. Our supervisor then walks the site, maps the risk zones and photographs the gaps — at no charge.
Programme design
Device layout, visit frequency and action thresholds drawn zone by zone, with scope and pricing in writing inside three working days.
Contract & mobilisation
Scope, SLA and pricing signed. Stations and monitors installed, numbered and plotted on the site plan.
Reporting begins
Visit reports from day one, the first trend report at the end of month one, and your documentation file opened on site.
Contract tiers
Indicative monthly pricing for a single site up to 10,000 sq ft. Your survey sets the final figure.
Standard
₹4,500/ month
Monthly visits for low-risk offices and retail floors.
- One scheduled visit a month
- Crawling insect & rodent cover
- Numbered device layout
- Visit report each time
- GST invoice, single site
Assured
₹11,000/ month
Fortnightly cover with trend reporting — the food and hospitality standard.
- Fortnightly scheduled visits
- Adds fly & flying insect control
- Monthly trend report with charts
- Threshold-triggered corrective visits
- Documentation pack maintained
- Supervisor attends your audits
- Quarterly programme review
Critical
On survey
Weekly cover for food processing, pharma and clean-room environments.
- Weekly or per-shift visits
- Zone-wise thresholds and action levels
- Fumigation & container treatment on call
- Dedicated site supervisor
- 4-hour escalation response
- Multi-site rollout, one reporting format
- Annual programme audit by our QA team
Visit frequency by site
The starting point we design from. Your survey adjusts it zone by zone.
| Site type | Covered area | Visit frequency | Reporting | Devices |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate office | Up to 20,000 sq ft | Monthly | Visit + monthly summary | 12–20 |
| Restaurant / QSR | Up to 5,000 sq ft | Fortnightly | Visit + trend chart | 10–16 |
| Hotel | 50–150 keys | Fortnightly | Visit + trend + review | 40–80 |
| Warehouse | Per 50,000 sq ft | Fortnightly | Visit + trend chart | 60–120 |
| Food processing | Per production block | Weekly | Full audit pack | 80–200 |
| Pharma / clean room | Per classified area | Weekly or per shift | Full audit pack | On design |
High-risk zones inside any site — receiving bays, waste yards, raw material stores — are always serviced at the highest frequency on the contract, regardless of the site average.
Who you are contracting
A licensed operator, not a labour supplier
We hold the applicator licences ourselves, employ our supervisors directly and keep the material approvals current in our own name. Nothing on your site is subcontracted to someone you have never met.
That matters at audit time. When an auditor asks who applied what, at what dilution, under whose licence, on which date — the answer is one file, held by one company, and our supervisor is standing there to open it.
Licensed in our own name
Applicator licences held directly, copies in every site file.
Directly employed teams
Supervisors and technicians on our payroll, trained and re-certified annually.
Current approvals
Material approvals and safety data sheets kept live, not chased at audit.
One format, every city
Multi-site groups get identical reporting wherever the site is.
Programme performance
Measured across contracted sites over the last twelve months.
What QA and purchase teams say
From sites audited by third parties, not by us.
“The device map was the thing that changed our audit. The auditor walked the floor with the drawing, found every station where it was marked, and closed that section in ten minutes.”
Sandhya Rao
QA head, food processing unit, Hosur
“We had four vendors across four cities and four different report formats. One contract, one format, and our monthly review went from a whole morning to twenty minutes.”
Vikram Sethi
Purchase lead, hotel group, Delhi NCR
“Thresholds were crossed in the receiving bay on a Thursday. A corrective visit happened on Friday without anyone from our side raising it. That is the part I actually pay for.”
Faisal Ahmed
Warehouse manager, 3PL, Bhiwandi
Add a Before and After image to enable the slider.
Documentation you can hand straight to an auditor
What procurement and QA ask us
The eight questions that come up in almost every tender.
No. A supervisor walks the site, maps the risk zones and returns a written scope with pricing. You are free to take that scope to anyone else — there is no charge either way.
Our reporting format is built to satisfy the pest management sections of the common food-safety and hospitality audits used in India, and we adapt the format to whatever standard your site is actually audited against. Tell us the standard at survey and we will show you a sample pack before you contract.
We do, in our own name. Supervisors and technicians are directly employed. No part of the service on your site is subcontracted, and licence copies sit in your site file.
Thresholds are agreed per zone at programme design. Crossing one triggers a corrective visit automatically and raises a corrective action that is tracked to closure — you do not have to notice it or ask for it.
Yes, under a single contract with identical device layouts, reporting format and escalation rules at every location. Group-level reporting rolls the sites up so you can compare them side by side.
Our site supervisor attends. They bring the current documentation pack, walk the auditor through the device map and answer the pest management questions directly.
Survey inside a week of enquiry, scope and pricing within three working days of the survey, and mobilisation — device installation and numbering — inside a week of a signed contract.
That is decided at survey. Most crawling insect and rodent work runs alongside production with zone controls; fumigation and any application needing clearance is scheduled into your shutdown or shift gap, agreed in writing in advance.
A note on chemicals
Less material, better placed
A managed programme uses measurably less chemical than repeated blanket spraying, because monitoring tells us where the pressure actually is. Physical exclusion, waste discipline and device placement do most of the work; a treatment is what happens when those are not enough.
Everything applied on your site is a government-approved formulation, recorded by name, dilution, quantity and location on the visit report — and every one of them has a current safety data sheet in your file.
Quarterly pest pressure briefing
Seasonal risk by industry and region, plus what auditors have started asking for. Written for QA and facilities teams.